The phrase references a perceived disparity between the monetary rewards of partaking in illicit actions versus pursuing a profession within the research of crops. It means that legal endeavors, regardless of their moral and authorized ramifications, might provide larger financial acquire than the sector of botany, a department of science involved with the construction, properties, and biochemical processes of all flora. As an example, a person may make more cash promoting unlawful substances than working as a botanist researching plant illnesses.
The expression’s recognition stems from its succinct portrayal of societal worth methods and financial realities. It highlights the potential misalignment between socially helpful professions and the precise compensation they supply, prompting reflection on the incentives that drive profession selections. Its historic context is rooted in ongoing discussions in regards to the financial undervaluation of scientific fields and the disproportionate income generated by illicit actions. This results in a broader consideration of useful resource allocation and societal priorities.
